Agentcode

Use case

Operations automation software you describe in plain words

Orders arrive by email and get retyped, stock counts live in a workbook that is a day behind, and the weekly report is assembled every Monday morning from three systems. AgentCode turns those routines into applications your operations team runs.

No card to start · A person approves every change before it goes live

In short

AgentCode is an AI automation platform for operations teams. Someone in operations describes the routine: how an order gets from an email into the system, what a delivery has to show before it counts as complete, which numbers belong in the Monday report. The agent writes the code for a small web application that does it, your team uses it, and the code belongs to your company. Each new routine becomes another application built the same way.

The problem

The work runs on habits and a shared workbook: orders retyped from email, a stock figure that is right until somebody forgets to update it, and a Monday report rebuilt by hand from three systems that disagree.

What AgentCode builds for it

You describe the routine the way you would hand it over to a colleague going on holiday: where the order comes from, what gets checked, who needs to know when something is late. The agent writes the code for an application that carries it out, runs the tests, and passes the change to a person for approval before it goes live. Orders stop being retyped, the stock figure comes from one place, and the Monday report is a page somebody opens rather than a morning of work. When the process changes, you describe the change and the application follows it.

Where the week actually goes

Ask an operations team where the time goes and the answer is rarely the interesting work. It is the retyping, the chasing, and the rebuilding of the same view of the same numbers because the view does not exist anywhere as a page.

Those routines are specific to your company, which is why no product off the shelf fits them and why a small purpose built application does.

  • An intake screen that turns an order email into a record without anyone retyping the lines.
  • A delivery board that shows what shipped, what is late and who has already been told.
  • A stock view that reconciles the count in the warehouse with the count in the system.
  • A scheduling page that assigns shifts against the rules your supervisors apply by hand today.
  • A supplier chase list that flags a purchase order which has passed its promised date.
  • A Monday report built once from the three exports instead of assembled each week.

One place for the numbers

Most operations disagreements are not about judgement, they are about which figure is right. Two systems hold a version of the same stock count, a third holds what the customer was promised, and the workbook on the shared drive holds a fourth that somebody trusts more than the others.

An application that reads all three and applies your rule settles the question. The rule is written down once, in code a person can read, and it produces the same answer for everyone who opens the page. When a supervisor disagrees with a figure, the argument is about the rule rather than about whose copy is newer.

The systems you already run stay in place. The application reads from them and writes back where your team expects, so nothing has to be migrated before anything improves.

Built to be changed

Operations processes change with the season, the supplier and the customer, so a tool that cannot be changed quickly becomes a tool nobody uses. That is the practical difference between describing a change and requesting one.

You describe what is different: a new carrier, a second warehouse, a rule that treats pre orders separately. The agent changes the code, runs the tests, and a person approves the change before your team sees it. Nothing shifts silently, and nothing waits a quarter for a development slot.

It is also worth saying what this is not. A tool that clicks through screens on your behalf breaks the moment a screen moves. Here the logic is written as code against your data, which is why it survives a supplier changing their portal. See <a href="/automation/rpa-software" class="link-merge">the alternative to RPA software</a> for that comparison in full.

See it run

From a description to a working app

Agent Run

Pick a task

Plan

  • planning

Files changed

Test run

0 failed

Pull request

Open

You review and merge. AgentCode never merges on its own.

Questions departments ask

What is operations automation software?

It is software that carries out the repeatable parts of running a business day to day: taking orders in, tracking deliveries, keeping stock figures straight, building schedules and producing the regular report. The version that works fits your process rather than asking your team to adopt somebody else's.

How is this different from a script that clicks through our systems?

A clicking script copies what a person does on screen, so it breaks when a screen changes and nobody can read what it is doing. Here the agent writes ordinary code that works with your data, which a person can review and maintain. It survives a supplier redesigning their portal, and the rules are visible.

Can operations staff describe the process themselves?

Yes, and that is the point. The person who runs the routine explains it in their own words, including the exceptions that never make it into a specification. The agent writes the code, somebody approves the change, and the result matches the process the team actually follows rather than the documented version.

What happens when a process changes mid season?

You describe what is different and the application is changed to match. A person approves the change before it reaches your team, and the earlier version stays in the history. That is quicker than a documentation update and it removes the gap where half the team follows the old rule.

Further reading

Operations teams usually pair two reads. Workflow automation covers the rules behind orders, dispatch and scheduling, and the alternative to RPA software explains why a small application beats a script that clicks through screens on your behalf. For the weekly report side, working with Excel covers the workbook everyone still wants.

AgentCode for other departments

Put the next process on rails

Describe the job once and your department gets the application that runs it. See pricing.