For one developer, Replit and Cursor cost almost the same to start: Cursor Pro is $20 a month and Replit Core is $25, or $20 billed annually. For a team of five they diverge sharply, because Cursor charges $40 per seat and Replit's $100 Pro plan covers up to 15 collaborators, so the same five people cost $200 a month on Cursor and $100 on Replit. The catch is on the other side of the ledger: Cursor publishes what your subscription includes in dollars at every tier, and Replit publishes no figure for what a request costs at all.

That is the whole comparison in one paragraph, and the rest of this article is the working behind it. Every price here was read from Cursor's and Replit's own documentation in August 2026, because both vendors changed their billing in the first half of the year and most of what is written about them is now out of date.

Replit vs Cursor pricing at a glance

Tier	Cursor	Replit	What the difference buys
Free	$0 Hobby, capped agent and completions	$0 Starter, free daily agent credits, 1 published project	Replit's free tier ships something live on a URL. Cursor's lets you try the editor.
Entry paid	$20 Pro, includes $20 of model usage	$25 Core, $20 annual, includes $25 towards top models	Nearly identical money. Replit adds hosting and a database, Cursor adds Tab completion.
Middle	$60 Pro Plus, includes $70 of usage	Nothing between $25 and $100	Cursor owns this rung. A Replit builder who outgrows Core jumps four times the price.
Power	$200 Ultra, includes $400 of usage	$100 Pro, $95 annual, includes $100 towards top models	Replit is half the sticker. Cursor includes four times the stated model budget.
Team seat	$40 Standard, $120 Premium, per user	Pro covers up to 15 collaborators for $100 total	The biggest gap on this table. See the maths below.

What does each subscription actually include?

This is where the two products stop being comparable in the way a table implies. Cursor expresses your allowance in dollars of model usage: $20 on Pro, $70 on Pro Plus, $400 on Ultra, then on-demand at API prices once you pass it. You can hold that against last month's invoice and check it.

Replit expresses your allowance in two parts, and it is easy to read the plan card and see only one. The current wording gives you "more free agent usage" and, separately, a dollar figure "towards most powerful models", which is $25 on Core and $100 on Pro. The two pools drain at different rates, and only the second one has a number attached. If you have been assuming your $25 covers everything the Agent does, it covers everything the Agent does with the expensive models, which is not the same statement.

Why can Cursor tell you what a task costs and Replit cannot?

Because they meter different things. Cursor meters consumption at published model prices, so the unit is a dollar and the dollar does not move. Replit switched in mid-2026 to effort-based pricing, where a request is billed by the time and computation the Agent spent on it, decided after the work finishes.

Replit's own guidance on what that costs is worth quoting in full, because it is short: "Simple tasks may cost less than $0.25, more complex tasks may cost more than $0.25." That replaced a flat $0.25 per checkpoint, and the change is genuinely more honest about what heavy work actually consumes. It also removes the one number a buyer could plan around. There is no floor published, no ceiling, and no stated typical figure.

Neither approach is wrong. Metering by effort matches cost to reality better than a flat rate does. But if your job includes telling someone what next quarter costs, one of these two vendors hands you the answer and the other hands you a range with no ends on it.

What does Replit vs Cursor cost for a team of five?

Here the seat model matters more than the sticker price, and the result surprises most people.

Line	Cursor Teams	Replit Pro
Base cost, 5 people	$200 / mo ($40 x 5 Standard seats)	$100 / mo (one plan, up to 15 collaborators)
Included model budget	Stated per seat, in dollars	$100 towards top models, shared across everyone
Hosting and database	Not included, you supply them	Included, apps run on Replit
Autocomplete	Unlimited Tab on paid plans	Not the product's focus
Parallel agents	Per seat	10 across the plan
Forecastable?	Yes, seat cost plus a stated allowance	Base yes, agent spend no

So Replit is half the base cost for five people, and the reason is structural: Cursor sells seats and Replit sells a workspace that collaborators join. Before you take that as a win, notice the row underneath. Five Cursor seats each carry their own stated allowance. Five Replit collaborators share one $100 pool, and they are sharing it under a billing model that will not tell them in advance what any given request draws down. The team that saves $100 a month on the base plan is the team most exposed to a surprise on the usage line.

There is also a cost that does not appear on either page. Replit hosts what it builds, so a prototype is live the moment it works. Cursor does not host anything, which means a team standing up real infrastructure needs somewhere for it to run and a way to get it there, and the tooling that provisions the server and ships each release without downtime is a separate line item you should count when you compare the two totals.

Which is better for an existing codebase?

Cursor, without much argument. It is an editor, so it opens the repository you already have and the agent works inside it. Replit's model is that the project lives on Replit, and while you can import from GitHub, you are moving a codebase to get an agent onto it rather than pointing an agent at where the code already is.

If most of your work is changes to something that already exists, with reviewers and a branch policy, that difference outweighs every price on this page. It is also the point where a third option becomes relevant: an agent that runs on your repository and returns a pull request, rather than one you sit inside. We cover that shape in what an AI coding agent does and the wider field in the best AI for coding.

One thing to check before you buy Cursor for a team

Cursor applies a Cursor Token Rate of $0.25 per million tokens on Teams and Enterprise plans, and by Cursor's own statement it applies to bring-your-own-key usage as well. If your plan for controlling spend was to supply your own API keys, price that line first. It is small per token and it is not zero, and teams that budgeted for BYOK meaning free are the ones it catches.

So which should you buy?

Buy Replit if the job is getting a new application built, hosted and clickable, especially if some of the people doing it are not engineers. It is the best tool in the category for that and the collaborator model makes it cheap for a small group. Set a spending cap before anyone starts.

Buy Cursor if the job is daily work in a codebase that already exists, if Tab completion is worth money to you, or if you need to know your number before the month starts. The middle tier at $60 also means there is somewhere sensible to go when $20 stops being enough, which Replit does not offer.

Buy neither if what you actually want is finished, reviewable work arriving on the repository you already have at a price that does not move. That is the case for a flat-rate pull-request agent, and it is a different product from both of these rather than a cheaper version of either. The full breakdowns are on our Replit review, Replit pricing and Cursor pricing, and every tool in the category sits together on AI coding tool pricing.

Keep reading

Replit vs Cursor pricing in 2026: what each one really costs a developer, and a team of five