Comparison
Sourcegraph Cody Alternative: a Flat-Priced PR Agent for GitHub and GitLab
Agentcode is a Sourcegraph Cody alternative for teams that do not want an enterprise contract or a per-token meter to get a coding agent. It connects to your GitHub or GitLab repo, turns a task into a reviewable pull request, and bills a flat monthly rate.
In short
Sourcegraph Cody is an enterprise AI coding assistant built on Sourcegraph's code search, with deep multi-repo context, audit logging, and compliance controls. Sourcegraph discontinued Cody Free and Cody Pro in 2025, so as of July 2026 Cody is Enterprise-only, with contracts starting at $16,000 and AI usage metered by credits; Amp is the team's separate, usage-based agentic tool for individuals. Agentcode is a pull-request-native alternative for teams that want an agent without an enterprise contract or a usage meter: it connects to your GitHub or GitLab repo, turns a described task into a reviewable pull request with your tests run first, never merges on its own, and bills a flat $29 a month. Choose Sourcegraph for code search and context across thousands of repositories; choose Agentcode for predictable, self-serve pull requests on the repo you already run.
Where Sourcegraph Cody shines
Sourcegraph earned its reputation on code search at scale, and that is still the honest reason to pick it. If you run thousands of repositories and need to search, understand, and make context-aware changes across all of them with audit logging and compliance controls, Sourcegraph is built for exactly that: its indexing and multi-repo context are genuinely hard to match, and Cody plugs your whole codebase graph into the model. For a large enterprise that has already standardized on Sourcegraph for code intelligence, keeping the agent in the same platform is a reasonable call.
Where Agentcode is different
The gap Agentcode fills is everyone below that enterprise tier. In 2025 Sourcegraph discontinued Cody Free and Cody Pro, so Cody is now an Enterprise product: contracts start at $16,000, are sold annually per seat, and meter AI usage with credit buckets you top up. Amp, the team's newer agentic tool, is the individual path, but it is pay-as-you-go by token, so heavy use gets unpredictable fast. Agentcode is the alternative when you want a coding agent without any of that. It connects to your GitHub or GitLab repository, you describe a task, and it plans the work, edits the code to match your existing conventions, runs your test suite, and opens a pull request your team reviews. It bills a flat $29 a month with no per-token meter and no annual enterprise minimum, it is review-first so it never merges on its own, and it never trains on your code. The trade is enterprise-scale code search for predictable, self-serve simplicity: choose Sourcegraph when cross-repo intelligence across thousands of repos is the job, choose Agentcode when you just want reviewable pull requests on the repo you already have, at a price you can predict.
| How they compare | Agentcode | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Core strength | Turns a task into a reviewable pull request on your existing repo. | Code search and context across thousands of repositories at enterprise scale. |
| Who it is for | Small and mid-size teams that want an agent without a sales call. | Large enterprises standardized on Sourcegraph for code intelligence. |
| How you buy it | Self-serve, flat $29 per month. | Annual enterprise contract; Cody Free and Pro were discontinued in 2025. |
| Pricing model | Flat subscription, no usage meter. | Enterprise from $16,000 with credit-metered AI usage; Amp is pay-per-token. |
| Git hosts | GitHub and GitLab, pull-request-native. | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and Perforce for code search; agent review via CI bots. |
| Tests before review | Runs your existing test suite and shows it green in the PR. | Focused on context and code intelligence rather than running your CI suite for you. |
| Control and privacy | Review-first; never merges on its own, never trains on your code. | Enterprise controls, audit logging, and compliance filters on the Enterprise plan. |
Want the background? Read what an AI coding agent is, or compare what AI coding assistants actually cost.
Sourcegraph Cody pricing vs Agentcode pricing
The two are priced for different buyers. Sourcegraph is an enterprise platform, so its agent comes with an enterprise contract and credit-metered AI usage; Amp, its individual tool, is pay-as-you-go by token. Agentcode is a flat self-serve subscription. Figures below are as Sourcegraph published them and as we checked in July 2026; verify the current number on their pricing page before you buy, because enterprise pricing is quoted per team.
| Plan | Price (USD) | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Sourcegraph Amp | Free credits, then usage-based | The team's agentic tool for individuals: start free, then pay per token as you use it. |
| Sourcegraph Enterprise | From $16,000 / year | Cody plus code search across all your repos, audit logging, and credit-metered AI usage; sold per seat on an annual contract. |
| Agentcode Starter | $29 / mo billed yearly | One connected repo, task to reviewable pull request, GitHub and GitLab, review-first, no usage meter. |
Sourcegraph Cody pricing as published by the vendor and checked in July 2026. Check their site for the current figure before you buy.
Sourcegraph Cody alternatives: your questions answered
What is the best Sourcegraph Cody alternative?
It depends on what you need Cody for. If the job is code search and context across thousands of repositories, few tools match Sourcegraph and the honest answer may be to stay. If you mainly want an agent that turns tasks into reviewable pull requests without an enterprise contract or a usage meter, a pull-request-native tool like Agentcode is the alternative: it works on your GitHub or GitLab repo, runs your existing tests, and bills a flat monthly rate.
Is Sourcegraph Cody still free?
No. Sourcegraph discontinued Cody Free and Cody Pro in 2025, so Cody is now available only on the Enterprise plan, where contracts start at $16,000 and AI usage is metered by credits. The team's newer tool, Amp, offers a free tier with credits and then charges by usage. Agentcode has no free tier but bills a flat $29 a month with no usage meter, which keeps a team's cost predictable.
Does Sourcegraph Cody open pull requests on my repo?
Sourcegraph is built around code search and context, with agentic features like Batch Changes for large-scale edits and CI-based review bots. It is an enterprise code-intelligence platform first. Agentcode is built specifically around the pull request: you point it at your GitHub or GitLab repo, describe a task, and it plans, edits, runs your test suite, and opens a PR your team reviews and merges, without ever merging on its own.
Sourcegraph Cody vs Agentcode: which should I choose?
Choose Sourcegraph Cody when your problem is understanding and changing code across thousands of repositories and you need enterprise search, audit logging, and compliance controls. Choose Agentcode when you want an agent to open reviewable pull requests on the repo you already have, on GitHub or GitLab, with your tests run first, on a flat monthly bill and no enterprise contract. It is enterprise-scale intelligence versus predictable, self-serve pull requests.
How much does Sourcegraph cost compared to Agentcode?
Sourcegraph Enterprise starts at $16,000 on an annual contract and meters AI usage with credit buckets, while its Amp tool charges by token after a free allowance. Agentcode is a flat $29 a month with no usage meter and no minimum contract. For a small or mid-size team that wants a coding agent without a procurement cycle, the flat plan is both cheaper to start and easier to predict.
Last updated: July 2026
See the difference
A reviewable pull request, every time
Pick a task
Plan
- planning
Files changed
Test run
Pull request
You review and merge. Agentcode never merges on its own.
Compare Agentcode with other AI coding tools
Weighing up the cost of each? Read what AI coding assistants actually cost, or see the enterprise AI coding assistant requirements. If you are still comparing the whole field, the guide to the best AI for coding covers nine tools with verified pricing and an honest note on who each one is wrong for.
Try Agentcode on your repo
No new IDE. Connect a repo and review the first PR.